thepower1802 (August 20, 2008 at 5:38 pm)

Lol if you question it you are a heretic. That is something that perfectly describes the right wing philosophy about EVERYTHING. Question the war and you aren't patriotic. Question the president and you hate the US. No one is positive about everything regarding global warming, but are people questioning whether or not we should be better to our earth? Umm, last time I checked everyone agrees that pollution is bad.

Dmoney3788 (August 20, 2008 at 3:47 pm)

Well if it has already been disproven by so-called "real" scientists, I am sure you could easily quote their work or findings instead of making yourself look like a fool. If my claims are false and the video is false, please disprove them then instead of talking about it. At least that is the way people with half a brain actually have a meaningful debate. If you cannot bring evidence that disproves this vid or the book that you probably didn't read, then you lose.

playfulpaul1985 (August 20, 2008 at 2:06 pm)

we have tottaly detroyed this planet not i dont drive but am scared the extintion of animals

klim8hokes (August 20, 2008 at 1:01 pm)

Why do you continue to talk glibly about current climate 'warming' when it is now widely acknowledged that there has been no 'global warming' for the last ten years, a cooling trend that many think may continue for at least another ten years? How can you talk of the climate 'warming' when, on the key measures, it isn't?

klim8hokes (August 20, 2008 at 12:58 pm)

So your answer is essentially: "No, I can't".Got it. Thought so.

klim8hokes (August 20, 2008 at 12:57 pm)

. The fundamental point has always been this: climate change is governed by hundreds of factors, or variables, and the very idea that we can manage climate change predictably by understanding and manipulating at the margins one politically-selected factor is as misguided as it gets.

sunnydayone (August 20, 2008 at 10:47 am)

Don't need to disprove what is claimed in this video or your lame book,it has already been done by the real scientists.Yes of course I know what an ad hominem argument is,but hey,if the cap fits!

Dmoney3788 (August 20, 2008 at 5:55 am)

So a question is itching to me, Can you actually address and disprove the claims in this video and the claims made in the book called "Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1500 Years," or are you going to shut off your brain, close your ears and call everyone a twat?

Dmoney3788 (August 20, 2008 at 5:52 am)

You must have never learned your logical fallacies. Ever heard of the logical fallacy called "ad hominem?" Just type it into wikipedia. Here is a tidbit: "An ad hominem argument consists of replying to an argument or factual claim by attacking or appealing to a characteristic or belief of the person making the argument or claim, rather than by addressing the substance of the argument or producing evidence against the claim...Ad hominem arguments are always invalid in syllogistic logic..."

belmont162 (August 20, 2008 at 12:59 am)

... climate variability, no paper can be found that questions the fundamental warming capabilities of greenhouse gases. Yet the mainstream press thrives on debate, and so bizarre theories from unqualified yet self-appointed experts often appear as the counter-argument to that of a scientist."-- Professor Matthew EnglandARC Federation Fellow and Director of the Climate and Environmental Dynamics Laboratory, University of NSW